This week I've been struggling to write stories. When you write for children, characters act in good faith, bad actors can be turned around with a kind word and everyone gets a happy ending. It's how stories work. But when they're juxtaposed with real world events as monumentally tragic as the war in Ukraine, it becomes harder to affirm those reassuring messages.
In my stories good triumphs over evil, the school bully can be won round, and everyone ends up happy. They're the values we try to reinforce in children through the stories we make for them. But when the real world comes crashing in it becomes harder to knuckle down and repeat those reassuring moral tales. In my stories adversity is only ever temporary; and being kind, friendly and warm hearted will usually get you everywhere - but it's not true is it? Not really...
I want children to believe that it's true. I want to live in a world where it's true. I want children to see those values modelled and then try and exemplify those values in their own behaviour. But when the grown ups repeatedly prove that it's actually the amount of money you have and the size of the gun in your pocket that gets you where you want - what's the point? Am I actually doing a disservice to children in reinforcing the kind of positive behaviour that so often triumphs in stories but so rarely does in real life? Let's face it, if Harry Potter were a real story Voldemort would win every time.
As I watch the news coverage of the war in Ukraine I see familiar story patterns being used again and again to couch a very real narrative in almost fictional terms. We have goodies and baddies, hourly plot twists on 24/7 news coverage, I 've learned the names of people and places I've never heard of before, I've learned more about the movements of a 40 mile convoy of Russian tanks than I ever wanted to.
This morning, while listening to the news, it sounded like the news reader was actually frustrated that the convoy hadn't moved for days, as if they couldn't wait for the next horrific plot twist, as if this was all happening in some sort of bingeworthy Netflix drama rather than a terrible reality, as if they needed the script writers to hurry up the plot and cut to the action.
The news is being couched as a story. The Ukranians are plucky underdogs standing up to a big bad bully. In reality they're a population living through hell. Why do we have to turn reality into a narrative like this? Does couching this conflict in story terms make the horror easier to digest? Does it make it feel one stage removed from our lives? This isn't happening to people like us, it's happening to characters we know and are familiar with - the poor victim, the mean bully, the plucky resistance fighter...
Does it make us believe that 'everything will be all right in the end'? And if it does is that really the best message to be giving people? We should be facing this horror, collectively, as grown ups in all it's calamitous barbarism, rather than viewing it as the 'all is lost' moment in a Marvel franchise, the moment just before the heroes save the day by being the good guys.
In every story I've ever written, at this moment, the underdog would rally and they would win. It's what should happen. Through creating stories where it repeatedly does, have we nurtured a population who believe it will, regardless of the reality of the situation, because that's how stories work and this war is being reported as one. It's not helpful.
At a time where I am finding it harder to tell stories, the news seems determined to turn reality into one. We all love a happy ending, we all expect a happy ending, the news wants us to believe it might just happen, but we all know the truth, time to treat us like grown ups.
In the meantime if you have anything to spare that may help those suffering please donate here:

















