Showing posts with label arthur rackham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arthur rackham. Show all posts

Saturday, 19 December 2020

Off with the Faeries again by Steve Gladwin

A reappraisal of Faerie Tale, by Raymond Feist

You know how it is? At a certain point in your life you read a book that later, you vaguely remember might have been an influence on your life and creativity? And so you choose to go back to it to see what all the fuss was about. Quite often, of course, it proves to be a damp squib, a shadow of what you remembered.

But there are those times when the sheer thrill of the first read comes back to you all over again. Not only is it all there as you remembered, but there's so much more - so much so that you want to tell everyone about it.

So here goes!

Imagine the dark woods. Imagine the creepy house with a history of bargains and secret cults. Imagine the company of the fey waiting at the top of Erl King Hill, and imagine that they are soon to leave, as their season once more comes to an end. The fair folk make rare appearances nowadays, maybe once or twice in a hundred years.

But there is a treasure buried on the land, one of gold coins so valuable that a few of them alone are worth a small fortune. How did they come here?

Deep within the cellars of the house is a secret room, which, when opened, reveals a safe full of seemingly indecipherable documents, some in languages so ancient they have almost been forgotten.

Despite the presence of two rival courts of faerie and the traditional opposition of the good queen and the evil king, all might have been well if the secret room had been left untouched by the new owners of the house.

--or if they had not destroyed an old pledge by digging up the hidden treasure.

But there is a spirit out in the forest who wants the treasure to be dug up, and who wants the old pact to be broken. To do that, he makes sure that the hidden key to the locked room – is found.

 


So far, so trope, you might say, and turn to something you like the sound of more. But then you’d be missing out on two things; an astoundingly good book - which just keeps on surprising and manipulating the form - and the fact that it is written by a hugely respected writer of fantasy fiction. This book, then, is a one-off, in more ways than one.

The simplicity of the title, Faerie Tale, belies the book’s depth and complexity, let alone the fact that it was written by renowned fantasy writer Raymond E. Feist, author of the classic ‘Rift War’ saga and much more besides. Feist wrote it in 1987 and he has never written anything else remotely like it since.

Sometimes writers take a leap into the dark and experiment with something new. Quite often, depending on how satisfying they might find the experience, or how well it might be received, they may never choose to leap in the same direction again!

But, for me at least, if you decided to write a one-off novel about faerie, you’d be pretty hard-pressed to better this. Here are a few reasons why.


A few nice gold doubloons 


*Faerie Tale is a genuinely scary novel, which treats its subject with great respect. It has believable characters caught in impossibly deadly situations, having no idea at first why this has happened and how it can be resolved.

*The location, especially the house, Erl King Hill itself, and the Troll Bridge, under which the terrifying ‘Bad Thing’ lurks, are powerful, eerie and evocative and in the case of the bridge, make you want to hurry your steps over it as possible.

*’Faerie Tale’ is based on already powerful old tales, which include the warring faeries of Shakespeare’s  A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, the chilling tale of the Erl King himself, the border ballad of Thomas the Rhymer and the Norse tale of Wayland Smith. At no point does the author show any sign that he doesn’t know this material absolutely and has full control of it.            

Arthur Rackham's  'Titania Asleep', (but it's the fact that Puck is lurking in the background with the 'Love in Idleness' juice that really matters!) 
'     

*Of the many similar books that I have read, Faerie Tale carries an almost constant creeping dread entirely in keeping with its subject and plot - a combination of foreboding, but also foreshadowing. The sense of foreboding initially grows over it like a shadow, one which which eats gradually at the characters, their grasp and understanding of what is reality. The second acts more like a future ghost haunting the reader with what might be to come.

*Faerie Tale is always asking questions of us as readers, as well as its characters. It is a novel which encourages questions, but especially on those subjects about which we know next to nothing - the morality and amorality of the faeries and their different factions, the reawakening of ancient enmities, the legacy of betrayals and corruption so old they are only just within the memory.




Richard Dadd - Fairy Feller's Masterstroke - Public Domain


*It also understands the world of faerie. I can’t pretend to have ever been there, although I’ve written about it plenty of times, but Raymond Feist does two rather incredible things in this book. First of all, he manages to bring together the once popular discredited flower faerie version of faerie, as seen most memorably in Arthur Rackham’s illustrations for A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and combine it with something far more Brian Froud and Alan Lee, or – should you have had the chance of reading- Terry Pratchett’s wonderful Lords and Ladies. One minute it’s as if you’re diving full pelt into the famous mad English artist Richard Dadd’s Fairy Fellow’s Masterstroke, which – part English pastoral and part Hieronymous Bosch - has a very disturbing feel if you look at it for long. The next you’re deep in the gloom of the forest from which the great European fairy tale collections of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm originated. The fact that Raymond Feist manages to marry the two and make it work so well is a true testament to both his craft and knowledge, and makes you wonder how he did so, so well.

*Secondly however, there is the rather tricky problem with sex, and particularly with the amorality of the faeries. For me, the author’s true mastery of the faerie world is shown in two early uneasily and erotically charged sequences with the legendary figures of Puck and Wayland Smith and our screenwriter hero Phil Hasting’s daughter Gabrielle, either one of which could have turned into either rape or consensual sex, and neither of which do.

*But it’s the final extended sequence, when Phil’s two eight-year-old twins Sean and Patrick are the pivotal figures in a race against time as the more timid Sean attempts to save his brother Patrick from a fate worse than death, that Feist is truly able to unleash the wonders of faerie. The depictions of the contrasting Fairy courts of Queen and King are portrayed in a quite masterly fashion.


villagephotography wordpress.com


*Finally, there are the characters of Sean and Patrick themselves. There is an unwritten law in Middle Grade Fiction that the main actions must be both led and performed by the young characters. In contrast, in Young Adult fiction, the hero or heroine often acts more like a pseudo adult, than a middle grader on whom adult situations are suddenly forced.

For me, Sean and Patrick are both the best and the best-drawn characters in the book. Because they are twins, they feel things together, like when one is in danger etc. Without giving away any spoilers, it’s the twins who perform the pivotal actions that enable things to be resolved to some degree at least, and it’s clear the author is with them all the way, as he trusts them with a good chunk of the narrative, steering us regularly away from the complicated, often strident world of adults in peril, to the quieter, but often far more immediately horrific closed-in world of the boys, who know that things are wrong from the start.

It’s the boys and their journey which make the novel tick, but uniquely, this is done without us ever feeling as if we’ve been robbed of the adults, their feelings and problems, their burgeoning sexuality, rows and insecurities. If I was to take one thing from the novel that is different from the usual fare, it would be the characters of the boys, our twin narrators to the inconceivable. For all the worries which accumulate around the adults, and Gloria and Phil Hastings’ daughter Gabby in particular, it is the boys, and Sean, in particular, who lead us on this incredible journey into darkness and back out again.

So, as I've made abundantly clear, 'Faerie Tale' - should dark horror/fantasy be your thing, (and I have to say that nowadays it's very rarely mine), is not only well worth rediscovering thirty years later, but infinitely worth the read at any time.

Faerie Tale by Raymond E. Feist is published by HarperVoyager, (now with a brand new cover) and is also available on Kindle, You'll find copies in all the usual places. Enjoy.

 

 


Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Terry and the Bad Fairies, by Steve Gladwin



It's lovely to be invited to write a regular blog here. I hope to share with you a few intriguing ideas and obsessions. So dear reader - let us begin.

Elves are wonderful. They provoke wonder.

You can’t really say what a faerie looks like. It appears only as it desires to. All you see is that illusion, that glamour. Whatever appearance the faerie chooses, gives you your sole reference point. A fairy has you believe what it wants you to believe. Should you fail to understand that lesson ----



Elves are marvellous. They cause marvels.

Many prefer to think of fairies as tiny, delicate wisps, like the Cottingley fairies who danced so prettily around the girls in their starched Victorian white. Or perhaps rosy cheeked mischief makers like Arthur Rackham’s cherubic Puck. In another Rackham picture however, there is a sinister lurking presence in the background of Titania’s bower. This too is Puck. He is no longer so sweet, (if he ever was), but the gleeful servant of his dark master. (My mistress with a monster is in love!)

I learnt to tell the difference early on when I was lucky enough to be given a dream trio of books to study for GCE English. Not only A Midsummer Night’s Dream, but Cider with Rosie and To Kill A Mocking Bird by Harper Lee were gifted to me. In one fell swoop I was taught about magic and illusion, introduced to sex and cider behind a hay cart, and learnt the importance of combatting intolerance and bigotry. I also learnt that faeries could be bad.

Elves are fantastic. They create fantasies

In twenty years of being a pagan druid, I’ve met many people who claim to have seen faeries. Many of these are people whose judgement I trust. I’ve spent many happy performance hours playing and directing versions of Oberon and I still know all his speeches. I was even hand fasted to a Midsummer Night’s Dream theme. I love faeries at their baddest and have little patience with the Victorian flower fairy version. If Oberon and the rest were to begin behaving reasonably, I’d feel let down.

Elves are glamorous. They project glamour.

At the moment I’m writing a book about the composer Ralph Vaughan Williams and faerie. It’s fiction of course, but I was amazed to learn recently that his last unfinished work was to be an opera based on the stories of both Thomas the Rhymer and Tam Lin. It seems to make an eerie sort of sense of my own wild fictional imaginings, but it also unites two of the most well known of the stories of English faerie. Each, however similar, seem to carry an opposite message. On the one hand we have true Thomas of Erceldoune, choosing to follow the Queen of faerie to Elfland, (Childe Ballad 37) but allowed to leave when his own life is forfeit because of the ‘tithe' that must be paid to hell’. On the other there is Tam Lin, the kidnapped Lord of Roxburgh (Childe ballad no 39) made captive in his youth by (maybe even the same) faerie queen. Fair Janet battles for his very soul, as her lover's form switches between lion, serpent and a fierce hot brand.



Elves are enchanting. They weave enchantment.

So are these examples of good and bad faeries?  Or are they just the same faery in different moods? How do we know which version we’re going to meet? Will it be the faeries of the seelie court, -- supposedly the goodies, or those of the unseelie court, who can be as nasty as they come? In my favourite modern fantasy trilogy, The Fionavar Tapestry, Guy Gavriel Kay uses a similar idea by dividing his elves into the Unseelie svart alfar, _ (a name also used by Alan Garner in The Weirdstone of Brisingamen,  and the Seelie like, lios alfar. As he spent a year preparing The Silmarillion with Christopher Tolkein, he was surely in a good place to recognise that there might be more than one side of faerie. 

Elves are terrific. They beget terror.

It’s very clear in which court the 'gentleman with the thistledown hair', belongs in Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell. He seems to exist solely to tease and manipulate and destroy. He feasts on exotic and extinct fauna, has a castle surrounded by dead men’s bones and takes great relish in the hunting and destruction of a whole pack of wolves. However his sustained and, more often than not, unwelcome acts of kindness to Stephen Black, show him more quixotic in this instance at least. He is by a long way the villain of the piece. However neither by the end of the book can we be wholly sure of the true nature of the John Uskglass, the Raven King, whose shadowy presence grows throughout the book.  His role is left deliberately ambiguous, with only clues to what he might be when he - Lord Voldemort like, returns in his full power!

Terry Pratchett understood bad faeries better than most. Lords and Ladies has a chill undercurrent throughout, for all the jokes about dwarf Casanovas with step ladders, royal falconers called Hodges aargh and anything done by the magnificently bawdy Nanny Ogg. His faery lords and presiding Lady cannot understand the idea of cruelty because it does not form part of their moral compass. Poking someone harder when they are already being tortured, just seems like a good idea to them. It takes the reader a while to realise that lurking in the background of Lords and Ladies is the faerie plot of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

Thus in order to prevent ‘Titania’ from allowing her anger at the royal estrangement to wreck things any further for the human world, ("We are their parents and original'), Nanny Ogg and her dwarf paramour venture underground to have it out with ‘Oberon’. Essentially they request him to have a word with the Mrs. 

Nanny succeeds in the sort of task few would dare try, because, despite all the jokes, she’s a very powerful witch herself. In the end however it is her friend Esme who discovers the only way to beat the queen. Maybe Granny Weatherwax doesn’t understand the concept of defeat. She probably wouldn’t accept it even if she did.


No-one ever said elves are nice

In the last few years of his writing life, Terry Pratchett returned to both the witches and the world of faerie in his Tiffany Aching books. The final book in the series, The Shepherd’s Crown, is the last book of his to be released. I like the idea that like Vaughan Williams, almost the last thing he set down was about faeries.

 There are of course many other characters in literature who have discovered to their cost that a faerie is none of those things it either appears to be, or others have had us believe. Maybe they just needed an Esmerelda Weatherwax in their corner. She could tell a bad faery from a good faery. Elves were all the same as far as she was concerned.


Elves are bad.


Quotations from Lords and Ladies by Terry and Lyn Pratchett 1992

A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare



Steve Gladwin





Author of The Seven published by Pont Books 2013
Shortlisted for Tir na n-Og prize 2014

'I really like its rigour, its pace, its wit and the way you step so 'lightly and fiercely through the window between the worlds.'

Kevin Crossley Holland

Find out more about The Seven here.

gwernseven.wordpress.com

https://www.facebook.com/gwernseven