In this blog I am writing as a reader rather than a
writer. Sometimes it’s interesting to
sit on the other side of the fence, just to see what we think is good practice
and what isn’t.
I’ve just finished reading yet another book which ended
before I was expecting it to, because the publishers chose to put the first
chapter of another novel after the end of the main book. It seems to happen so
often these days, and maybe some people want to know what the author’s next
book is and have no idea how else to find out – but not me, and not immediately
after I’ve finished their last one. If
I’ve enjoyed the book I need to have a little space in which to remember and
enjoy it, and to come out of the world the author has created. (And if I haven’t enjoyed it I’d be unlikely
to want to read another by the same author anyway.) I find it really annoying when I get to what feels
like a climax in a story, but I can see a whole chunk of pages left to read, so
I think, “That means there will be another twist before the end! I wonder what it is?” Then I turn the page and – oh! It was the end after all, which by then comes
as a bit of a let-down. Simply because
the publisher made the decision to include the first chapter of the author’s
next book, which is set in a different world peopled with different characters.
This happens with real books and with Kindle books too – it says I have a further 20 minutes to read, but then Wham! The book I'm reading ends, because again they’ve
decided to include the opening chapter of another book.
Not only is this really disrespectful to the author, who
hopes readers will be sufficiently engaged not to want to plunge straight into
another, it is also disrespectful to the next book. If you are tempted to read the first chapter and you like it,
you then have to make a decision: either a) make a special trip into town and see if the book is in your local bookshop, or b) go to the library and see if you can find it there. In both cases if
it’s not in stock you may have to order it and wait for some weeks, by which
time you have forgotten what the chapter was all about. Alternatively you can c) order it online,
either as another book (with yet another opening chapter of a different book at
the end) or to download on your kindle.
The latter is the easier course, but even then I don’t want to read a
similar book directly after I’ve just finished one. I like to go from, say, a crime novel to a
children’s book, to a historical saga, to a biography, before going back to
another book by the original author. By
which time I have completely forgotten what that chapter was all about anyway.
And sometimes I may find a book on the library shelves that
looks interesting, or in a bookshop or in a Charity shop. I flick through the first few pages to see if
it’s one I might enjoy, and think, “Oh yes, this looks familiar. I must have read it.” And put it back on the shelf, without
realising that I’d only ever read the first chapter.
I have no beef with publishers including a list of the
author’s other books, either at the front or the back of the book – that is
really useful, and it doesn’t take long to read through the list, or you can go
back to it at some future date and make a note of any you want to read at some
time in the future. But it doesn’t spoil
your pleasure in the book you’ve just read.
I suppose publishers credit us all with an extremely short
attention span – they are so afraid that if we put the book down we may never
pick up another. Or maybe it's the accountants, who think it would be a good marketing ploy to make us buy another book right away. Either way, it’s a bit like those
crass idiots that insist on talking over the end credits of a television
programme that we might have particularly enjoyed, to tell us about some
programme that is coming up, that bears no relation to the programme we’ve just
watched and is often grossly insensitive.
In spite of the many complaints they’ve had about this, they still
haven’t learnt that some/most of us need to pause and relish what we’ve just
watched before going straight on to something else. Again, they seem to be terrified that if we
turn the television off we may never turn it on again – or at least, not to
their channel!
Imagine going to a restaurant where, as soon as you had
finished a lovely satisfying meal, they then insisted you must also eat a
taster of what you might choose to eat next time you go there, just when you were too full to appreciate it.
All right, grumble over.
I love reading, I really do, and I have a houseful of books to prove it
– but I would rather read the whole book, please, not just the first
chapter. And not straight after the book
I’ve just read. I know it’s not the
authors’ fault – I don’t imagine any of us have ever asked for it. But it is incredibly annoying for the
readers. Please, publishers, consider
us!
Latest book: The Lost Treasure of Aquae Sulis
4 comments:
I totally agree with all you've said here, Lynne!
There's also a point when you're wondering how X can tie up all the threads of a plot in the little space left, only to discover there's another book in the series before whatever-it-is is resolved.
Annoys me too. I now automatically check whether the last page of the book is actually the last page of the story and not, as you point out, the end of the first chapter of the next.
Agree 100%, Lynne.
Thanks, everyone - glad I'm not alone in this!
Post a Comment