Beware! This is a
post written in haste and anger. Long ago, my best beloveds, there was an exam
called the Eleven-Plus. This was administered in the last year of primary
school and determined whether a child’s secondary education would be in a
Grammar or Secondary Modern School. There were (I believe) four papers:
English, Maths, Mental Maths and General Intelligence.
Back then, the oldest classes practiced past papers throughout the year, ready
for the Big Exam. In many homes, past papers became additional homework. Pupils Passed or Failed the exam but as the number of grammar school places
available varied and as the Eleven Plus passes were weighted in favour of boys,
the exam was a kind of game. Despite
that, the exam overshadowed a whole twelve months of a child’s life and more. That
was history.
This is
now. In the second week of May, all over England, children in Year Six will
be completing their SATs papers: their Standard Attainment Targets. The
schools, once again, have to play the game but this time it is so a) the school
isn’t given a poor rating by Ofsted and b) is therefore not forced into the academy
system.
Many Year
Six classes have been doing mock Sat’s for quite a while. This is seen as far
better that than leaving pupils unprepared for an exam situation, especially
when your school prestige depends upon it, and Ofsted will be watching. Then, during
SAT’s week itself, the whole school quietens in reverence. I know because I’ve
visited schools where SAT’s have been going on and where even the year Five
children were sitting mock SAT’s. My
bookings were always with Key Stage One classes and the classrooms were usually in an annexe.
My heart
sinks right now, really it does. Do we need to subject young children to all this
pressure? Especially as tests seem to be added so often: add a test on entering
Early Years; ass a proposed test once children are in Secondary School, in case
something was not quite right with the Key Stage Two results. . . So easily it
all becomes teaching to the next test.
I visit
schools as a writer and have been a teacher in the past but so often, now, I meet
children able to quote linguistic terms but unable to tell me when they last
wrote a story or what was the last writing they enjoyed doing. I think children write about three stories in the whole of their primary years, although they do write in many other forms too: diaries, accounts, recounts, letters, reports and more.
Part of the reason is that creative writing doesn’t fit easily with tick-boxes. The SPAG tests – Spelling,
Punctuation and Grammar - are structured for easy marking, which will mean marking by computer soon, if not now. (Somebody must be making a profit
somewhere, I suspect. Probably in America.) Interestingly, the
English writing test is still assessed by the teachers. Thank heavens for that.
Yet – and my
greatest gripe - is that even that mercy doesn’t stop children who used to love English no longer caring about a once-favourite subject.
What a triumph
for those politicians who so smugly set up and encourage the current SATS regime!
All of
which is a long way round to say that, before the 11th May, I’ll be sending off
a Good Luck card to an eleven year-old - partly in sympathy, partly as
encouragement and partly as kind of protest.
Just how
did we end up here?
Penny
Dolan.
12 comments:
Sigh...we have the same problem here. Nation wide testing at several levels. A "My School" website which has turned into a sort of league table. Children being withdrawn by anxious parents and others being told to stay home on the day so that they won't lower the overall performance of the school.
We did something called the Progress Certificate - rather like the 11plus but the pressure was not the same as it is now.
Oh this is so wrong - even though research tells us that children learn best when they discover for themselves, the system still insists on cramming them with stuff that they have to regurgitate - but nobody measures how much they understand.
Having said that, the 11+ wasn't much fun, either. And, instead of using it to measure schools, it divided children into those who passed and those who failed. So please, Mr or Ms Education Minister, don't even think of going back to that!
I know who is making money on our US assessments-- Pearson, who designed the PARCC. My library was closed all of this week to accommodate make up testing! I don't know how much pressure our students feel-- I proctored students who tried to sleep through the whole test. The kicker? The school test score makes up HALF of my teacher evaluation. Argh!
Thank you, Ms Yingling! Now I know I'm not being unreasonably suspicious about such profitable developments. What a reason to close a library for a week.
Catdownunder and Jo,thanks too. I know that most schools and individual teachers do all they can to minimise pupil's stress levels, but these systems transmit all the institutional & political pressure down to the kids, especially when stirred up by the media every now and again.
How did we get here? Nearly 40 years of Tories, Tories Lite and Monetarism, plus the short-sighted, narow-mindedness that goes with them. And when these policies begin to hurt, blame it on immigrants and scroungers, or perhaps the Unions - or anybody except the people who actually caused the economic disasters and resultant anxiety that goes with it.
Well here's a coincidence! I drafted a post for girlsheartbooks yesterday entitles 'Education, education, education - tests, tests, tests' - but then deleted it because it was basically raw fury. What makes me so angry is politicians' promises about investment in education, when all they do with the money is spend it on yet more curriculum constraints and tests, making teachers' and children's lives a misery, and ruining the experience of learning, which should be one of the great pleasures in life :(
So true, Jenny, exactly as you say! I fear that any idea of a wider curriculum is disappearing.
(And now, with the pot of "enticement" money emptying, it seems even academies are having problems.)
This is so angry making! And the worst thing is I can't see any change coming soon. Poor, poor kids.
I'm an 11-plus failure myself, Penny, so I'm totally with you on this.
I meet children able to quote linguistic terms but unable to tell me when they last wrote a story or what was the last writing they enjoyed doing
Me too. It's very sad.
What Catdownunder was referring to is called the NAPLAN test. It's administered at Years 3,5,7 and 9. And we have just spent over a term preparing for this year's. Part of the English one is the child writing either a "narrative" or a "persuasive essay" and you aren't told in advance which it will be. So the child will go cold into a test lasting about 45 minutes and be faced with a task that involves writing a story about a topic such as "The box". No choices, just "The box" or whatever it is that year. Or a persuasive essay, again, no choice. This includes EAL students, except the newly-arrived. Strictly speaking, parents can refuse to have their children participate, but most kids do it. And then there are loud complaints in the press that teachers are "teaching to the test". Well, yes. What did they expect? Kids have been asking me recently, "What happens if I fail?" And I reassure them that it's just to see how they're going and not to worry about it.
I have heard recently that there's talk of marking it by computer, not sure how you can do that with narratives or even persuasive essays.
It stinks, I agree, but we just do the best we can for the kids.
Sue, that English test sounds grim indeed.
Of course that's the way writers write, isn't it? Just pick any old title and immediately write for 45 minutes and then sit back and think "Yep, that's done". I don't think so!
Such testing is wretched stuff!
Post a Comment