Hello all. I
hope you’ll indulge me, like many contributors recently I’m up to my eyeballs
and haven’t had the usual time to dedicate to this month’s blog. Also I’m
thinking aloud and no doubt as usual my thoughts are confused, convoluted and
no doubt far from earth shattering.
I’ve been
musing about how sometimes there’s a value in not being in full possession of
the facts and letting our imagination fill the gaps and how we most often do
this when we’re young, being less worldly wise (though on reflection I seem to
have been particularly divorced from reality.) The upshot is I’ve been
wondering how we can capitalise on this not knowing in our writing for
children.
In my
defence it was a different era. As I was becoming a teenager I was lucky enough
to read ‘Animal Farm’ before being at all politically aware, so enjoyed it the
first time round almost exclusively as a story and only later understood the allegorical
ramifications. At around the same time I had been roped into a band – we called
ourselves ‘Rust’ which was a suitable name! – simply because I had a bass
guitar, not because I could play it. The other boys were a bit older than me
and actually the two leaders of the group had some talent. I never saw the
words written down but they wrote a song, which I thought was called ‘Urban
Gorilla’. As those were practically the only words I could understand when they
sang, I enjoyed fantasising about a gorilla wandering around town (this was
also before Planet of the Apes became popular.) My imaginary gorilla found it a
fascinating contrast to living in the rain forest and was intrigued by everyone’s
reaction on seeing it wandering down the high street. It was a lot later – and a
bit disappointing - to realise that my band mates were referring to a
revolutionary human guerilla!
I also spent
a lot of time wondering how Lucile and her partner lamenting her loss in the
song could possibly have four hundred children. Did they run some kind of
gigantic foster home? Maybe the strain of looking after them all had understandably
been too much for her? At least that many children could presumably harvest the
‘crops in the field’ that she had also abandoned couldn’t they? It eventually came
as another disappointment to learn that she’d more realistically left four
hungry children instead.
Maybe I was exceptionally
naïve but I wonder if a plot or sub plot could centre around one or more
children harbouring similar complete misunderstandings as I did when I was
young?
~~~~~
Actually, I
did write one short story entitled ‘We need Trolls’ in which a girl panics when
she sees this message on the family message board and wonders if her parents
want some trolls to move in before she finds out that the message was about
toilet rolls. It was inspired by a text from my wife when I was out at work. Thank
goodness I understood that message.
No comments:
Post a Comment