I’d
planned to start this blog by diving straight into the Big Five personality
traits – openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness &
neuroticism (acronym: OCEAN) – and extoll their virtues as the best tools ever
for crafting character arcs.
But
during a FB discussion about the Big Five earlier this month for WriteOnCon (an
online conference well worth catching next time, btw) I remembered why I’d
found them so helpful when redrafting my debut novel:
OCEAN
had nailed the problem of how to make an epiphany work.
The
anatomy of epiphanies had bugged me ever since James Scott Bell’s Writing Your Novel From The Middle persuaded
me that a Midpoint Epiphany was a great plotting device. John Yorke’s Into the Woods expands on them at
length, but story structure alone wasn’t enough to make mine seem ‘organic’ so I turned
to psychology for help.
After
millennia of debate about how many aspects there are to human personality,
current psychology has (broadly) settled on five categories: openness to new
experiences, conscientiousness in fulfilling a task, the multiple facets of extraversion
plus all the variations of agreeableness & neuroticism.
Taken
together, they express the myriad permutations of personality.
These
categories aren’t binary. People aren’t Open or Not Open. Each is a sliding
scale from more to less, and encapsulates aspects of personality that tend to
go together.
For
example, being sociable, talkative & assertive are manifestations of
extraversion, while being systematically late, lax and indifferent indicate a
low level of conscientiousness.
Under sufficient stress
these traits are mutable, evolving in response to major life events – events so
important they make us step up to the mark and decide what we’re prepared to do
to achieve our greatest ambitions or defend that which we hold most dear.
There’s loads of stuff about OCEAN on the
web if you’re interested (and a bunch of online tests if you don’t mind some
random organisation knowing who you are) but here’s a quick summary of each for
ease of reference.
OCEAN definitions
Factors associated with openness include curiosity, original thinking, insight & creativity, openness
to new & unusual ideas. Appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual
ideas. Those high in this trait also tend to have a broad range of interests.
Examples of low-score
behaviour
|
Examples of
high-score behaviour
|
Someone who prefers not to be exposed to
alternative moral systems, has limited interests, down-to-earth attitudes,
non-analytical, narrow-minded.
|
Enjoy seeing people with new types of haircut,
body piercing, curious, imaginative, non-traditional.
|
Conscientiousness: being organised, systematic, punctual,
achievement-orientated, dependable. High levels of thoughtfulness, good
impulse control, goal-driven. Tendency to be mindful of details.
Low score
|
High score
|
Spur-of-the-minute decision-making, unreliable, hedonistic, careless, lax
|
Never late, hardworking, persevering,
punctual, self-disciplined, dutiful.
|
Low score
|
High score
|
Prefers a quiet evening in, reading rather
than parties, sober, aloof, unenthusiastic
|
Life of the party, active, optimistic, taking
charge,
|
Low score
|
High score
|
Quick to assert own rights with confidence; irritable,
manipulative, uncooperative, rude.
|
Agrees with other’s opinions, good-natured,
forgiving, gullible, helpful
|
Neuroticism: tendency to be anxious,
irritable, temperamental, moody. Inclined to experience unpleasant emotions easily,
including anger, depression or vulnerability. Sometimes called emotional
instability. Tendency towards sadness.
Low score
|
High score
|
Not getting irritated by small annoyances,
calm, unemotional, hardy, secure, self-satisfied.
|
Constantly worrying about little things, insecure,
hypochondriac, feeling inadequate.
|
Constructing
a basic profile incorporating these traits seems to me a more efficient way to
create realistic, rounded characters than answering one of those long questionnaires
about the colour of their favourite t-shirt & TV shows they watched as
kids etc.
Better
by far (imho) to know how open they are to new experiences or if they’re
vulnerable and anxious. Not only will this
knowledge signpost how a character is likely to react to unexpected events but
also what actions they might plausibly initiate at each stage in their emotional/psychological
journey.
And
once you know their deepest, repressed fears, you can merrily create the kind
of obstacles which will test their underlying weaknesses to the utmost.
Think
Snakes On A Plane. Who’d give the air marshal in that film a phobia about
spiders?
Retrofitting character
arcs
For
me, OCEAN really came into its own when I had to rework a First World War coming-of-age
script after receiving a development advance from Walker Children’s Books. The
elements I needed were already in the backstory; I just hadn’t developed them
enough.
So, in the rewrite, I took my protagonist step-by-step to a more mature place, one
where she could – plausibly – reverse her deepest feelings about members of her
family.
Spoiler alert: the worked example below is based on an Openness subplot of this novel,
which will be out with Walker next year. (Hurrah!) I hope it’s detailed enough to
make sense without giving too much of the plot away.
Act 1
|
|
|
1
|
Pre-story trait to
be transformed
|
Stubborn loathing of
family member X (a soldier killed in the Battle of Verdun).
|
2
|
Initial openness
behaviour
|
Down-to-earth, non-analytical, limited life
experience, defensive about her opinions of her family
|
3
|
OCEAN traits
permitting transformation
|
Openness: a vivid imagination
Agreeableness: capacities for empathy & kindness
|
4
|
OCEAN traits
preventing transformation
|
Openness:
refusal to accept alternative points of views about her brother
Neuroticism: an unconscious desire for a substitute father
|
Act 2
|
|
|
5
|
Transitional
behaviour
|
Aroused curiosity about the outside world as she starts her journey;
fails first test by focusing narrowly on her quest rather than the suffering
of others
|
6
|
Pre-epiphany
behaviour
|
Forced to consider profiteer’s point of view, forced to consider
strikers’ PoV; forced to consider the suffering that led to ex-soldier Y’s
disabilities.
|
7
|
MIDPOINT EPIPHANY
|
While assimilating her feelings about Y, she recognises the
narrow self-interest that prompted her quest, but remains resistant to re-examining
her feelings about X
|
8
|
Post-epiphany
behaviour
|
Being more open, she observes the world more closely, leading to true
empathy for others.
|
Act 3
|
|
|
9
|
Completion of consequences
of EPIPHANY
|
On eve of the ‘final battle’, makes her peace with X
|
10
|
Final Openness state
|
In epilogue, evidence of new open attitude to disabled soldiers
|
6 comments:
Impressive way of looking at creating a character and planning out a story, Rowena!
It's always fascinating to hear about the extremely different ways in which writers approach their work!
Thanks, Rowena. Very helpful post!
Thank you for your comments, guys. I must say I'm wedded to it now (or at least for now).
Eye opening stuff - thanks for sharing in such a clear way! Lovely blog.
Thanks for sharing this on #GEAQA. That's fascinating to see how you were thinking. Really interesting and helpful.
Post a Comment