Re-reading Story
by screenwriting guru Robert McKee the other day, I came across this quote in a
section headed The Gift of Endurance: ‘Long before you finish [writing], the
love of self will rot and die, the love of ideas sicken and perish ... Of all the reasons for wanting to write, the
only one that nurtures us through time is love of the work itself.’
Cheerful,
huh? Especially on a short winter’s day, with weeks of getting up in the dark still
to go.
I mean,
let’s face it, who does love the work all the time? All too often the
actual process of writing is frustrating, demoralising and painful. Who hasn’t
ever asked: is my story any good? Will anyone buy it? Can I really do all this
over again?
It sometimes
feels as if self-doubt
is an interminable negative feedback loop, constantly undermining our
confidence in our ability to do the very thing we love.
And there it is again. That word. Love.
Personally, I suspect
it’s part of the problem. Saying ‘I love writing’ implies it is
necessarily a deeply rewarding emotional experience. When it’s not, a lot of us
seem to blame ourselves: maybe we don’t love our characters enough or our plots;
maybe the people who believe in us are just plain crazy.
But what is left
if we don’t buy into the notion that we have to love what we do in order to keep
doing it? Well, here are a couple of things that cheer me up no end.
According to research by psychologist Anders Ericsson,
elite musicians, athletes and chess players weren’t born with unique gifts. They
are instead highly motivated individuals who have to complete at least 10,000 hours
of deliberate practice over a period of more than ten years in order to achieve
their exceptional abilities.
To quote Christian Jarret’s handy 30-Second Psychology, for this type of
practice to work, ‘You don’t just repeat what you know but instead constantly
seek to stretch yourself. This inevitably involves forensic self-criticism,
repeated failure and a dogged ability to keep dusting yourself down and trying
again.’
Sound familiar?
Then how about this, also from Jarret:
‘Anxious individuals are more prone to attribute negative events to flaws in
their nature, rather than circumstances.’ That’s from the section about Fundamental
Attribution Error.
So, with all due respect to Mr McKee (who I
admire a lot), forget about endurance being a gift. It’s bloody hard graft. And
that’s the point. Lucky you if you do love the work, but that’s not the only
way. For me, for example, ‘the work’ is too abstract a concept to keep me going
year after year. I have to care passionately about this story, these
characters, their troubled dreams.
Keeping this passion alive is like tending a
fire: I have to sit down beside my story and look into its depths. If it’s
dying, I feed it more research, more imagination, more hard work. Sometimes it consumes
reams of notes about the main character’s motivation, or a single sheet with a clearer
articulation of the theme. At other times it needs more knowledge gaps. Tighter
scenes with more dramatic turning points.
Or more cake for the writer. Chocolate. Wine. Another
long walk with my darling dog...
But yes, sometimes I have to close down the
chimney flue and walk away, trusting that the embers won’t die completely.
I have boundless admiration for people who
keep writing regardless. Did you see that tweet about this year’s winner of the
children’s & YA category of the Costa Book Prize? Apparently Brian Conaghan
received 217 rejections. Two hundred and seventeen! Unbelievable. I’d have
walked away long ago, no question about it.
So all power to him – and everyone else who keeps
on keeping on.
May your fire never go out.
Rowena House
10 comments:
I don't love writing either!
But I do LOVE stories and that's what keeps me going.
Great distinction, Jan. I guess that's what we've all go to do: find that core thing that'll keep up going.
Thanks Ro. A great blog & reassuring to hear it's not just me battling with inner demons x
Demons part of the job, I suspect. Maybe they're why we want to write in the first place - to slay them, or at least engage them in a heated debate!
Great blog, Ro. I suspect we all have love, aka a creative urge, and once that has been fulfilled we as writers, artists etc need some kind of external affirmation - that's the hard part, feeling nobody cares, so why bother continuing? For all the published and very well known there must be many many people whose work has never seen the light of day. Van Gogh etc never basked in the light of his subsequent fame. But doing something as well as one can, there is satisfaction in that. 10,000 hours indeed :0)
I love it and despise it in equal measure. Thanks for this. I agree. One is not born with the gift of endurance. It grows on you like a callous.
Defining love beyond my skill (& self-imposed word count) so opted out with 'a rewarding emotional experience'. But perhaps loathing something is a measure of how much we want to love it (and sometimes manage to). Dunno.
But I think we can definitely admire those with callouses, Candy, and keep our fingers crossed that all those who deserve external affirmation get it, Eden.
Thanks both so much for commenting.
I do love writing. I like the process of it, and how I can translate something from thoughts in my head into something in the head of another person. But mostly I only like it when it's going well!
Me too, Becca! Success - however one measures it - is THE best motivator, imo.
Just to add, Brian Conaghan confirmed on Twitter today it was 217. Agents, publishers & courses. I take my hat off to him! {Thanks to Lu Hersey, too, for involving him in the conversation.)
Post a Comment