The kitchen is
full of the comforting smell of sugar and spice. I’m baking for the Friends of
the local Library Refreshment Stall” tomorrow, when along with the mince-pies
and scones, we’ll be handing out flyers for January’s Friends Quiz Event.
Yet today, on
the first day of December 2016, that sweet baking scent is stirring some
worried and bitter thoughts.
Our
centre-town library is a lucky one, designated one of five “core” libraries spread
throughout the County. The Friends fund-raise for small, occasional projects suggested
by the current library staff. We are not faced with bills for heating & upkeep
or legal fees to keep the building open, which I fear some libraries will be,
soon enough, or already are.
Yes, it’s 1st
December 2016 - and three months from now, on the first of April 2017, all the
library cuts planned in the name of austerity will come into effect, not only
here in my town but all over this County.
60% of the paid
library staff at “my” library, at all levels, will have gone and the hands-on
library work will have to be done by “general” library volunteers.
It is a big
change, but we are the lucky ones, with 40% staff remaining for now. In the
smaller libraries, the cuts are even deeper. They will be run by volunteers who
can “phone a named librarian” if they need help.
Right now, on
my desk, there’s a Volunteer Form, ready for me to fill in and return. In
January, there will be news of training days and on-line courses. What else can one do? Live in hope.
Outwardly, the
Carnegie building – in a town rather proud of its appearance – will show no
sign of those changes within. However, what worries me is the framework, the structure
“inside” all these libraries.What will happen to the “deep” library knowledge,
once all the trained staff have gone, as they must over time?
How will the culture
and the expertise – that much-scorned
word – be prevented from fading away? How will the library administrative
system actually hold together? And who
exactly, will be able to hold together a loose, disconnected library system?
I’m also, as a
naturally suspicious person, rather worried about a model that relies so
heavily on volunteers. Of course, people who give up their time for good causes
are obviously wonderful people, trying to meet the needs of what they see as a
local or national good.
Yet volunteering
is also a kind of bargain. People get something out of the work, whether a
social buzz, a skill-set to be practiced or learned, a more interesting place
to be, a chance to help others, a good feeling about themselves or all the set.
Such satisfactions are what keep the volunteers
coming.
However, volunteers
are not employed or contracted to turn up. They remain, largely, autonomous. If
the task doesn’t fit, they can stop turning up. If traffic or the weather is
bad, they might decide to stay away, especially if their health is less than
good. Family, hobbies, travel and other matters can demand their time and
attention too. How will all this be managed, once large numbers are
involved?
Heavens,
planning the schedule for Saturday’s four-hour Refreshment Stall was
complicated enough, with some not wanting to do this or that quite then.
Fair enough for a cake stall, but not so great for a public library service!
Will the few
remaining librarians really have time and energy to deal with endless weeks of
volunteer ebbs and flows, especially those in areas far less comfortable than
where I live?
I have another
worry, too: quite who
will manage the
group dynamics within the varied volunteer situations? Personally, I’ve
met
lots of generous, hard-working, helpful, practical-minded volunteers
without
any hint of attitude. Yet I’ve come across tales of self-centred special
interest groups; of long, power-play meetings about the colour of a
newsletter; of children’s activity teams excluding others who want to
help and more.
Such
antagonisms happen within the world of paid work, but it is far harder to
sort these matters out when you are beholden to your volunteer helpers. Who will be dealing with all this issues?
I’m sorry. I’m
sorry. The first week of December isn’t really the time to be so critical and
gloomy about the library service, which is something that I have loved my whole
life, but when is? Besides, I might be wrong about this and all will be well.
Move on, move on. Put up the fairy
lights and decorations. Stop sounding so miserable. Just fill in the Volunteer
Application form and be positive and hopeful.
I will, I
will, but maybe, while baking today, I’ll add a little more sweetness to the
cakes, just to be on the safe side for Saturday’s customers? A good idea, yes?
Rant over - and wishing you all a good December!
5 comments:
Hello! If you are "seeing double" on Awfully Big Blog Adventure AND the Awfully Big Review section, apologies! The doubling is entirely my error, courtesy of the new & helpful Blogger layout.
What you should be seeing, in the Reviews box, is a link to Jackie Marchant's excellent review of Brian Selznick's new book! If you click on Reviews, you'll find it there immediately, so do, do look.
Bah! It's only on the blooming non-shiftable blog-link interface that my error is visible and I'm hoping the thing will correct itself SOON.
Meanwhile, you get twice the cake and three lots of my grumpiness, if you include this comment.
And breathe . . . Order is now restored!
Well said, Penny! Hope your library event goes well - and maybe there will be a little more help from the Government with libraries in the New Year??? (There speaks the optimist...!)
I hope it goes well, Penny.
This afternoon I bumped into a qualified librarian who was made redundant, along with most of those remaining in Somerset, a year or two ago. She said that most of the people she was at library school with have either been made redundant or have left because the pressures in terms of time and money mean that it's not the job they trained for and loved. Very sad. And what you say about volunteers is quite true; it's not a long-term solution.
Post a Comment