I
have a secret other career.
Though
I’m most known – insofar as I’m known at all – as a writer of contemporary YA,
I have since 2006 (four years before my first novel was published) been
writing, and publishing, short stories for adults, mostly historical, almost
all about World War One or its aftermath.
Now
I’m having the chance to combine my two great writing passions – realistic YA
and historical fiction – as I have a story included in Walker’s forthcoming
anthology The Great War (pub. 3 July
2014). All the stories are inspired by actual artefacts, and my story, ‘Each Slow Dusk’, is inspired by a
collection of 1914-19 school magazines, from the school where I taught for
nineteen years. I curated an exhibition based on these magazines in 2004, so in
a way this story has been ten years in the making.
school magazines from WW1 |
I fictionalised details of
the school’s war effort, foregrounding the experience (often overlooked in war
literature) of a schoolgirl, sixteen-year-old Edith, whose dreams of higher education are shattered when she has to
leave school to care for her older brother, invalided out of the army with
rheumatism. It’s very like the rest of my World War 1 stories, apart from the
fact that the main character and the intended readership are younger.
Historical
fiction always produces tension between wanting to evoke the period so that it
comes alive for the reader, but not recreating it so systematically that it
lapses into pastiche. The story must work as modern fiction, so it has to feel
fresh, especially to a teen reader, who is likely to baulk at anything that
feels worthy or schooly. This was a big challenge for me: there are no battles,
no gore; the story takes place in a single day in a Belfast suburb. How could I make duty and quiet desperation
interesting to a modern teenager?
music from the period |
Unlike the intended readership, who are likely to
have a prolonged period of young adulthood, the teenage characters in ‘Each
Slow Dusk’ are children at school one
minute and adults the next – not only leading men into battle, but, in Edith’s
case, taking an adult caring role. Notions of duty are much more pronounced
than they would be today, and Edith seems both older and younger than a modern
sixteen year old. How could I make her
voice and choices accessible to a modern teen reader without compromising the
sensibilities of the 1917 narrator?
In
trying to evoke the Zeitgeist of 1917 I was scrupulous, but not heavy-handed,
about period detail, and about ensuring these details are used only when it is
natural to do so – when it would be equally natural to mention them in a story set
in modern times, rather than have them come blazing signs shouting Period Detail. Being a geek, getting
every detail exactly right matters to me,
but accuracy isn’t always enough. In ‘Each Slow Dusk’ Edith and her friend
Maud pass notes in class, and in one note they use the @ symbol – Meet you @ break. I spent some time
checking that this sign was in common usage in 1917, and was pleased to find
that it was. I liked the fact that it looks
so modern, and hoped it would be one of the many small details to help
bring 1917 alive for my reader. My editor agreed – but in the end the @ sign
had to go. Why? Because, although I and my editor knew it was correct, it was
flagged up at the copy-editing and proofing stages as looking anachronistic. And it only takes one little detail to break
the reader’s trust in you. On the night before we went to print, @ was replaced
by at.
I
once started to read a novel set in the thirties, where the characters’ sexual
attitudes were anachronistically modern. When they gathered round a television
to watch the coronation of George VI, I flung the book away in disgust, saying
‘Wrong coronation! Can’t even get that right!’ Later I discovered that it was technically possible, if highly unusual,
to have watched the 1937 coronation on television, but by getting the tone
wrong in other areas, the writer had compromised my trust. Once that compact
between writer and reader is broken, all the accurate period detail in the
world will not restore it.
the first in Wilson's excellent Victorian series |
5 comments:
What an interesting post. It really made me think - and I completely agree with the breaking the trust of the reader thing. For me, it's not just true for historical fiction. I have had it happen even in a completely fictional world, when a character does something that feels wrong. It jars my willing suspension of disbelief, and it's hard, although not impossible, to come back from that.
I fondly remember the first time the Today programme read out its email address. John Humphries (I think it was him) was clearly uncomfortable as he stumbled over the mass of letters and punctuation that included what he hesitatingly referred to as 'the commercial symbol for "at"'. Evidently it was clearly out of common use at that time, which is probably why we would assume that it would be anachronistic in 1917.
But it is not in any way a new symbol. In the days before computers, when even pre-printed invoices must have been an unaffordable luxury for many small businesses, everyone may have been used to seeing "3 doz eggs @ 2d" almost every day.
So if I had seen it used in your book, I might have paused for a moment but, on reflection, I hope I would have realised that it was a brilliantly observed piece of period detail.
A fascinating post. It made me think of the example of the TV version of "The Other Boleyn Girl" where Anne was shown wearing a necklace with a "B" - which many viewers were convinced was modern "bling" she'd never have worn, but was actually taken from a contemporary portrait. The trouble is, if you always write for your readers' expectations of a period, you may just end up perpetuating stereotypes, yet if you include accurate, but unexpected details, you may lose your readers anyway!
I've my first historical for young people coming out next month - what I found most reassuring was that I could check it against the memories of family members (it's set in the 1950s austerity period). Even then, memories aren't always reliable...
Interesting comments, everyone! Now I am almost wishing I had been brave enough to insist on the @!
Of course, it's all nit picking compared to the huge gaffs that arty-type writers and directors make in science fiction:
Star Trek encounters an energy barrier at the edge of the galaxy. They meant the Universe, but had to do some fast footwork to recover.
Firefly seems to take place in a single solar system with 210 inhabitable planets, every one of them with a 24-hour day and a 365-day year. Not to mention a temperate climate and Earth-standard gravity.
Buck Rogers opined that there were a googleplex star systems in our galaxy. If you turned each atom in the entire universe into a zero, you'd have enough to write out a googleplex — it's rather a big number. Conversely there are at most four hundred billion stars in our galaxy.
Star Trek III manages to use one quarter impulse power in space-dock. Full impulse power gets them up to just under the speed of light. It's about a million times worse than going around a multi-story car park in fifth gear with your foot only a quarter down on the accelerator pedal.
Compared to those, a tiny anachronism in a note or necklace is petty.
Post a Comment