If I begin while I am still entangled in my personal drama,
and there have been times when I have tried, my narrative becomes an achingly
boring diatribe of self-pity and/or resentment. If I wait until my emotions
have calmed down, I tend to lose intensity.
People often ask me what inspires me to write and I come
back with all sorts of answers that are true, but the single most important
truth is this. I write books I want to read.
I don’t read as much as I would like because it takes an age
for me to find a book that holds me. A Town Like Alice, The 39 Steps, The Gathering
Storm are all books that interested me from the very first page. I have to work
a little harder with Austen and Bronte, but they are worth the effort. But I
struggle when it comes to reading and that makes me want to create the sort of
book I would want to read.
It’s not necessarily action that holds me. I was enthralled
by Alan Bennett’s encounter of visiting his mother in a care home. Nothing
happened. I mean literally nothing, but I was totally captivated and so you
could say that good writing holds me, but you would be wrong. Thomas Hardy, for
instance, leaves me cold. I find Mr Hardy very gloomy and interminably
long-winded. After two pages describing Gabriel Oak in Far From the Madding Crowd, he succinctly finishes with “In short
he was 27.” I’m happier reading the short version. But I know I must be wrong about
him because he is enduringly popular with people whose opinion I respect.
Things really happen in Agatha Christie. Intrigue is usually
there from the very beginning, but I don’t get on with her either. That’s
nothing against Ms Christie. It’s me. Whatever it is that takes my imagination
is not found among her pages, although I enjoy watching her stories brought to
life on the television. I can’t put my finger on what catches me, but I enjoy
the stories I write.
I’ve written for Infants, for 8-12 year-olds and YA. Now I’m
writing a book for adults to read. My current manuscript is about something
that has happened to me. I’ve only edited it a couple of times so far – there
is a very long way to go – but think I have a handle on how to make it
interesting by using invented characters within the true events.
It seems to me that successful writers settle on one
age-group and stick to it. We can all think of exceptions, and they are usually
very, very talented. I’d never put myself in that category, but, unlike most
writers, I cannot keep to one age-group.
What is wrong with me? I long to read, but struggle to find
a book that captivates me. I long to write, but cannot settle on one age-group.
I can’t even settle on one genre.
I suppose I’m more creative than business-like and will
continue to meander through my writing career for the joy of it rather than commercial
success. The money is always welcome, of course, but, for me, the greatest
reward is the excitement of writing something I know I can enjoy reading.
It’s a wonderful bonus if others enjoy it too.
1 comment:
Maybe you're what I call an explorer reader - meaning someone who likes to discover and read all sorts of genres, lengths, different authors etc.
From personal experience I would wait a while if you're considering writing a kind of "issue" book based on your own experience of a life challenge ie the kind of book you hope will inspire and support others. Wait until you've reached the other side and become wise with all sorts of insights and inner strengths :)
Writing because you enjoy the creative process seems important and even essential to me. As you say, royalties and payments can be seen as a bonus - and if readers enjoy your books too then I would keep doing what you're doing.
Post a Comment