The gender of the book
often has something to do with the main character, but not always. If you've
read Gaiman's Stardust, he says that he
considers the book to be female, even though the main character and hero of the
book is male. Coraline is a female book too, in his mind, whereas Neverwhere is male.
So it's not necessarily to do with the type of book - a book
for girls, or a book for boys, or to do with the protagonist, the gender of the
main character. Reading on in his essay it became clear that even a book with a
male protagonist could be female. Partly it's to do with whether Gaiman
considers that it is the male or female character(s) who have been assigned
greater depth and complexity, or whether they behave, and are described in much
more "stock" terms.

When I write I don't think: 'I'm writing a book for girls',
or 'I'm writing a book for boys'; nor do I mentally assign a book a gender, or really even think
about it in those terms. When I think about the books I've read, I don't think
of them as possessing a gender as such either, or possessing characteristics
you might associate with a particular gender.

It's a different way of looking at writing, at how you
write, and how you envisage the book you're writing. It works for Gaiman, but
it doesn't work for me, and it might or might not work for you. It's like how
you start a book. For Gaiman it's never about the blank page. It's about the
opening or the character, or a scene, images, location, and an idea of how
these all come together.
Where I wholeheartedly agree with Gaiman is when he says
that 'Novels accrete,' and when you're writing the best feeling is most definitely when
you feel like you are the first reader, then the writer.
1 comment:
Interesting - I hadn't heard about this book. Thanks, Savita!
Post a Comment