Self-help books are not a modern phenomenon. They've always sold well, and reading examples from former centuries offers insights to any student of human nature. There’s no other genre that reveals more directly the anxieties, desires and beliefs of
ordinary people. I imagine they must be a precious resource for historical
novelists, in particular.
Especially fascinating to me are books on child-rearing. It’s
very revealing to see how certain ideas about children change radically over time, while others stay more or less the same. Take this double-page spread from The
School of Manners; or Rules for Children’s Behaviour, published in 1704. The
book is addressed to children directly:
The idea of bowing to one’s parents, or of not sitting down until told
to do so, may seem harsh today, but other items on the list are very recognizable, even if the language has changed. “Stop fiddling with yourself!” (3), “Don’t fidget!” (5), “Don’t
bite your nails!” (10) – these cries are still to be heard up and down the land. Then
there are the moments when the apparently familiar reveals itself in all its
strangeness – as when children are advised that if they need to spit they
should do it in the corner of the room and rub it into the floor with their foot
(11). I have a feeling we’re not in
Acacia Avenue any more…
Leaping forward almost two centuries to 1878, let's dip into Don’ts for Mothers. (Yes, the
guilt-tripping starts right on the title page!) It’s a similar story here. At
times, I find myself nodding in vigorous agreement, as the anonymous author launches
into some very sensible advice – by which I mean of course that it coincides with
the received wisdom of 2013:
Don’t confine your
daughter to fancy work and the piano. Mothers of England, let me entreat you,
rescue your girls from the bondage of fashion and folly.
Don’t avoid the
breast. The infant ought to be put to the breast soon after birth; the interest
of both the mother and child demands it.
Don't fear the vaccination of your child. It is one of the greatest blessings ever conferred on mankind.
Don't fear the vaccination of your child. It is one of the greatest blessings ever conferred on mankind.
Don’t point out
faults with an air of triumph or ridicule, so as to create irritation and
dislike.
At other times our author warns against practices that it would never have
occurred to me to consider:
Don’t attempt to
harden a young child either by allowing him, in the wintertime, to be in a
bedroom without a fire or by dipping him in cold water, or by keeping him with
scant clothing on his bed.
Don’t feel it
necessary to wash your infant’s head with brandy.
Don’t add either
gin or oil of peppermint to the babe’s food. It is a murderous practice.
Then there’s this…
Don’t hold
children’s parties. They are one of the great follies of the present age; where
children are dressed up like grown-up women, stuck out in petticoats, and
encouraged to eat rich cake and to drink wine, and to sit up late at night!
Their pure minds will be blighted by it.
Though initially put off by the idea of banning children’s parties, on reading what they consisted of in 1878 I
decided the author might have a point. Similarly, hygiene and the fear of passing on disease rather than chilly emotional distance lie behind the rule that "Infants ought never to be kissed except on the forehead, and even that should be seldom permitted." Context is important. Elsewhere, though, the
rationale for Anon’s advice seems rather elusive…
Don’t neglect to
be sure a child eats salt with his dinner. Let a mother see that this advice is
followed, or evil consequences will inevitably follow.
Don’t allow your
child luncheon. If he wants anything to eat between breakfast and dinner let him
have a piece of dry bread.
Don’t allow the
child to be with persons who stutter or have any extraordinary sort of
ugliness. However great their merits in other respects they are unfit to have
the care of children and should not be placed as attendants or instructors.
Of course I view the following with particular repugnance:
Don’t, on any
account, allow him to sit any length of time at a table amusing himself with
books, &c; let him be active and stirring. He ought to be tumbled and
rolled about to make the blood bound merrily through the vessels.
Excuse me while I step outside for a moment to shudder at the memory of
PE teachers past. Naturally I deplore any warning against books; on the other
hand, if we substitute computer games, the sentiment doesn’t look antiquated
after all.
8 comments:
Very funny - and horrific too! Am thankful I am no longer a child, sometimes...
Dinner was much earlier remember. No lunch, but dinner around 5.
That's still about 10 hours without a bite! You're made of sterner stuff than me.
Thanks for this - I love these little windows into other peoples' lives - I also wonder how much of them were successfully enforced? All for now - I'm off to buy some gin, in case I meet a baby needs washed ...
Regarding feeding a baby gin, remember that until very recently gripe water contained 3.6% alcohol.
The baby farmer in the book I'm writing at the moment advocates Godfrey's cordial, which was molasses and opium - supposed to cure cholic.
The point about vaccination is interesting. Vaccination against smallpox became obligatory in 1853 (it was the only vaccine for anything before Pasteur did his stuff with rabies) and there was massive antipathy towards the ruling, so this is a tiny glimpse of the controversy!
Stroppy, I imagine that sugar and opium would have some effect on the symptoms of colic, at least!
Interesting about smallpox vaccination being obligatory - I wasn't aware of that.
I came to this late Cathy... but brilliant post. I was thinking of some of the idiosyncrasies of my own childhood. My father wouldn't let me step over a drain cover for fear of germs. And we had to wear vests no matter what... summer or winter. But at least I was allowed lunch!
Post a Comment