I've felt very proud to be a writer this week, and
especially part of the children’s literature community. Patrick Ness’s bold and generous gesture - to
match £10,000 of donations to Save the Children to help Syrian refugees - has struck an entire orchestra's worth of chords. As I write this, on Monday night, the
total is rushing towards £600,000.
Patrick Ness |
Among those pledging £10,000 were John Green, Philip Pullman, Francesca Simon, Suzanne Collins and Cressida Cowell. Publishers have got involved too, and adult writers such as Jojo Moyes and David Nicholls. A group of YA writers in the US including Rainbow Rowell and Margaret Stohl banded together to put in their £10,000. Here, attendees at the Society of Authors’ Children’s Writers and Illustrators Group’s conference pledged £3,000, even though some had contributed already.
Most of us can’t afford anything like £10,000, of course. It’s
more than the average writer’s annual earnings. But there's no need to feel
embarrassed. Viewed as a
percentage of income, some of us may have outdone the big-hitters in generosity. Each contribution counts - if everyone who reads this blog donates the cost of a cup of coffee, it'll be matched penny for penny, which could make a good few hundred pounds.
And if you can't spare any more cash, just share the all-important link - which is HERE - again and again.
And if you can't spare any more cash, just share the all-important link - which is HERE - again and again.
Having been involved in the Authors for the Philippines and
Authors for Japan auctions (under the incredibly hard-working leadership of
Keris Stainton), I've seen how keen writers, editors and agents are to donate,
be involved, help in any way they can. Some
cynics jeered saying it was all about
publicity. So what if it were? The cash was raised for the people who needed it.
The best writers sow empathy in their pages, seeds that can grow and flourish in readers’ hearts and minds. So that one day those readers will read a news story about marauding migrants, and reach with their imaginations beyond the headlines, the politicians’ weasel words. They'll see scared teenagers, crying children, desperate parents, fleeing a dangerous home for an uncertain future. And they'll write letters, speak out, donate and even open their homes to people in need.
One of the icons of British children's literature is Paddington Bear. I wasn't sure about seeing last year's film, worried that a favourite character would be rendered sentimental or just wrong. Instead it was a wonderful experience, funny and charming, gently passing on a message of British tolerance and caring, an openness to strangers in need.
In the books and the film, Paddington comes to Britain in need, and finds kindness and a new home. However the truth would be very different. This blog post by an immigration lawyer spells out all the cruelties a real life Paddington would meet, seeking asylum in Britain. Lord Ashdown said yesterday that Syrian children grudgingly allowed into Britain now, could face deportation at 18. The campaign to help child refugees won't end with the appeal reaching £1 or 2 million pounds. If we truly care there is a lot to be done to change attitudes towards refugees, to stop the distrust and antipathy that has been allowed to grow. Children's authors can and do play a part in an education process about the difference between legal and illegal economic migration, legal asylum-seeking and those who pretend to be genuine refugees but are not.
In the books and the film, Paddington comes to Britain in need, and finds kindness and a new home. However the truth would be very different. This blog post by an immigration lawyer spells out all the cruelties a real life Paddington would meet, seeking asylum in Britain. Lord Ashdown said yesterday that Syrian children grudgingly allowed into Britain now, could face deportation at 18. The campaign to help child refugees won't end with the appeal reaching £1 or 2 million pounds. If we truly care there is a lot to be done to change attitudes towards refugees, to stop the distrust and antipathy that has been allowed to grow. Children's authors can and do play a part in an education process about the difference between legal and illegal economic migration, legal asylum-seeking and those who pretend to be genuine refugees but are not.
But for now, thank you once again Patrick Ness, for channelling the spirit of Paddington, for doing this brilliant
thing and taking us all along with you. And congratulations on your new book, The Rest of Us Just Live Here, as well.
I feel enormously proud to be part of the UK children's/YA community this week. What Patrick has achieved, and the way writers & the industry have got behind him, is incredible.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm so glad the narrative about refugees is changing. One question, though, Keren - is there such a thing as 'illegal asylum-seeking'? As far as I understand, it is perfectly legal for anyone to arrive here and claim asylum - am I wrong?
I was cheering wildly until I got to the last section. John Dougherty is right: there is no such thing as an illegal asylum seeker. Otherwise, great post!
ReplyDeleteAh, I put it badly. Some people claim asylum but have no legal right to it, and are refused. I'll change it.
ReplyDeleteA wonderful post, Keren!
ReplyDeleteA wonderful post, Keren!
ReplyDeleteA wonderful post, Keren!
ReplyDeleteRe. the 'legal/illegal' asylum seeking point. Perhaps it should have been 'legitimate' versus 'illegitimate'.
ReplyDelete'Legality' should never really come into it either way, since sometimes the law lags behind what is actually happening in the real world. Sometimes you have to say, 'This is the right thing... it's currently illegal... so change the damn law.'
I do think it's important to recognise that some asylum seekers are bogus, and abuse the system, making life more difficult for other people. But all too often bureaucracy is applied harshly, and laws need to be changed. And we should all be scrutinising the law, and lobbying for changes. Please do follow the link to the post by the immigration lawyer, it is truly shocking.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, Keren; the immigration lawyer's post is pretty shocking. Our laws are much too harsh, I think; and I don't believe it's "bogus" asylum seekers ( a term I hate, as it's been used so much to demonise genuine refugees - I know you're not doing that, but our politicians and papers definitely have done) who are the problem. I don't think we have that many people trying to abuse the system, and even if we did it should be possible to find ways of screening most of those out without punishing people who are already traumatised.
ReplyDeleteIt's ironic that it's Germany who is now setting the example while we retreat into a fortress mentality.
I agree completely, John. And I don't see a big problem with economic migrants either - having been one myself. The problem is with employers who exploit immigrants with very low wages, and our government should ensure that doesn't happen.
ReplyDeleteVery impressive generosity! Thanks for sharing this good news with us.
ReplyDeleteYep. Felt very proud to be part of the children's book community and to add my widow's mite. But then the children's book community is often involved in generosity on a large scale -- like the Authors for Japan and Authors for Nepal auctions -- or on a small, local, often anonymous scale.
ReplyDelete