Funny books aren’t taken
seriously by prize committees.
This was the point that
Julia Eccleshare recently addressed in her Guardian blog, raised by a reader
who had been casting her eye over this year’s Carnegie shortlist. The Carnegie is the UK’s longest established
and probably still most prestigious prize for children’s fiction. It is chosen by librarians – the adult
children’s book establishment. And so it
really does matter what kind of books they choose.
As Julia Eccleshare acknowledged, the
shortlist featured books about warring states, bereavement, terrorist attacks, poverty
and corruption. There really wasn’t a
lot of light relief.
Now, I like funny books. When I read children’s books for my own delight, it is the funny ones I take down from the shelf. I defy anyone to feel glum, while reading a copy of The Church Mice Adrift or Dougal’s Scottish Holiday. Adrian Mole Aged 13 and 3/4 is the title guaranteed to make me split my sides laughing: however flu-ridden, I am likely to end up falling out of bed.
Now, I like funny books. When I read children’s books for my own delight, it is the funny ones I take down from the shelf. I defy anyone to feel glum, while reading a copy of The Church Mice Adrift or Dougal’s Scottish Holiday. Adrian Mole Aged 13 and 3/4 is the title guaranteed to make me split my sides laughing: however flu-ridden, I am likely to end up falling out of bed.
Not only do I like reading
them, I try and write humorous books myself.
Intrigued, I went and cast
my eye over winners of the Carnegie. The
only recent title that leaped out at me as clearly comic was Terry
Pratchett's The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents, the winner in
2001. That’s eleven years ago. Not that recent, then.
In 1991, Anne Fine – a comic writer of genius, in my
opinion - won with Flour Babies. Only
actually that was a rather sombre title about the unfunny subject of parental
responsibility (not one of her best, I'd say, and nothing like
as good or as funny as the brilliant Diary of a Killer Cat). Before
that, Gene Kemp in 1977 (for the truly wonderful The Turbulent Term of Tyke
Tyler) was the last outright funny author to win the award.
As Julia Eccleshare points out, the Roald Dahl award
now exists specifically for funny books.
But it was invented because funny books were being excluded from the
mainstream shortlists. And funny books
shouldn’t be stuck in some kind of ghetto .
A truly funny book is a joy forever – and more than that, it’s a bloody
good book!
Myths about Funny Children’s Books
They don’t have anything interesting to say about
political and social issues
Read Adrian Mole – it probably gives a far better
impression of Britain in the 1980s, the economic hardships and
political debates, than other children’s books of the time.
They are not sophisticated, but all about farts and
poo-jokes
Helen Cresswell’s Bagthorpe saga is an incredibly
witty series – full of elaborate puns and jokes referencing Shakespeare and other
luminaries of the English lit canon. Or look at Anthony Buckeridge’s Jennings if you want elaborately funny plots
worthy of PG Wodehouse. Or Graham Oakley for superbly witty illustrations.
They don’t tackle difficult themes
The brilliantly funny The Worst Children in the World:
the Best Christmas Pageant Ever is about (I reckon) poverty, social exclusion
and the all-inclusive possibilities of religious belief, all told in the form
of a hilarious story about a Nativity Play.
Top that if you can!
They don’t need prizes – they will be popular anyway
That may be true of some - Horrid Henry or Mr Gum - but
a Newbury Prize (the American Carnegie equivalent) might have helped the brilliantly
funny Fudge books or The Best Christmas Pageant Ever to become better known outside their native land, and a Carnegie might have helped the wonderful Catweazle or
Jennings books to stay in print.
(And these days, when authors and series are axed much
more quickly if the sales aren't coming through, there is no time for the slow-burn build of word-of-mouth. Being overlooked at first can mean an author
never makes the big time.)
It’s not hard to write a funny book
This is a widely held view about both adult and
children’s books. And wrong. I’d submit it’s far easier to write a tragic
tale than a comedy. Kill off a child –
better yet an animal – you will make the reader cry. But to make them laugh? That’s real craftsmanship. To prove my point have a look at Joan Lennon’s
blog where she quotes the master comic craftsman PG Wodehouse.
Brilliantly funny stories that never won the Carnegie Prize
Crummy Mummy and Me
Hilarous stories about a punk mother and a daughter
old before her time. I especially like
the story with the squashed dog.
(Also look out for Fine's wonderful Diary of a Killer Cat series and the Summer House Loon – her first novel, and a
masterpiece.)
Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing
The
Legend of Spud Murphy
Manages to make a story about going to the local
library absolutely hilarious.
Dougal’s Scottish Holiday
Adrian Mole Aged 13 and ¾
The Church Mice Adrift
Humphrey the mouse lecturing the revolting rats on
Etiquette at the Court of King Louis XIV and nearly getting nobbled for his
pains – it’s class, pure class.
Catweazle
This started life as a hit TV series about a time-travelling eleventh century magician which still has its fans on DVD - I reckon the book should be much better known.
The Ogre Downstairs
The funniest of all Jones’s fantasies – but one
of the least acclaimed.
The Best Christmas Pageant Ever
These are American classics - but hardly known in Europe. They are side-splittingly funny, and full of heart.
The Best Christmas Pageant Ever
These are American classics - but hardly known in Europe. They are side-splittingly funny, and full of heart.
Link to Julia Eccleshare’s article
Emma Barnes's latest book is How (Not) To Make Bad Children Good
Check out Emma’s web-site or follow Emma on twitter or
facebook.
















